Driver Profile

Henry Albert photo

Henry Albert

Henry Albert is the owner of Albert Transport, Inc., based in Statesville, NC. Before participating in the "Slice of Life" program, Albert drove a 2001 Freightliner Century Class S/T™, and will use his Cascadia for general freight and a dry van trailer. Albert, who has been a trucker for 26 years, was recognized by Overdrive as its 2007 Trucker of the Year.


Truck Specs

Model: Cascadia 72" RR SleeperCab

Cab: 125" BBC Aluminum

Engine: DD15 455HP, 1550/1750 lb/ft

Transmission: Eaton Fuller RTLOM-16913L-DM Ultrashift

Front Axle/Suspension: 13,000 lb.

Rear Axle/Suspension: 40,000 lb. Airliner

Fuel Tanks: Dual 140 gallon

Wheel Base: 234"

Henry's Truck

Fellow Bloggers

Dick McCorkle photo

Dick McCorkle

Home: Carthage, IN


Gina Stumborg photo

Gina Stumborg

Home: St. Joseph, MO


Kurt Grote photo

Kurt Grote

Home: Bristow, OK


Upcoming Events

Sponsors

Freightliner Run Smart
Detroit Diesel
Receive updates via RSS

The Countdown To The Mid America Truck Show

 

The industry’s first commercial vehicle with an all-aluminum cab debuts. Dubbed the “shovelnose,” or Model 600, it launches theFreightliner brand.

 

 

Hello,

Welcome to the past, present and future of innovation!

Freightliner is just days away from kicking off its  70 th anniversary. The past has been rich with much innovation. As I reflect back in time and view each historical mark this company has made, it’s sure exciting to see how they plan to impact the future of trucking.

This year on March, 22nd at the Mid America Truck Show in Louisville, KY, the Freightliner organization has quite a surprise for its attendees. They will reveal a new concept vehicle designed to revolutionize the industry. Don’t miss out on this great opportunity to get an up close and personal look for yourself. If your not planning to attend the event, you can see the truck on the following website at a future date. http://www.freightlinertrucks.com/70years#revolution

I’m looking forward to a great event this year. It’s always nice to meet new faces andcatch up with friends. I’ll be working at the Freightliner booth during the day and plan to be at the Papa Johns Parking Lot in the evenings. If your attending this years event, I encourage you to come by and say “hello”. Hope to see you there.

Henry

P.S. I will have a small surprise for the attendees as well. I’ve made an aerodynamic addition to my trailer in hopes for even better fuel mileage.   

Please Come Out And Support The Second Annual Blood Drive At The Mid America Truck Show

Hello,

 I want to remind all of my readers who will be attending this year’s Mid America Truck  Show in Louisville, KY to come out and support the Trucking Solutions Group in partnership with the American Red Cross,  as we hold our second annual blood drive.

With all the recent natural disasters around the country, we hope that many of you will participate. We had a great response last year with over 75% of  participants being first time blood donors.

The blood drive will be offered for two days:

Friday, March 23rd from 11am – 5pm

Saturday, March 24th from 11am – 5pm

Look for the Red Cross Bloodmobile outside by the South Wing.  No appointment is necessary and all eligible donors are urged to participate.

Finally, I would like to thank the MATS (event) management for their support of this cause. We hope to see you there!

Henry

2012 MATS Driver Health Awareness Walk

 

 

“Walk and Talk” is the theme for the 2012 Mats Driver Health Awareness Walk. This is the Trucking Solutions Group third year to sponsor the walk and we are very excited about our new theme. This is the year to have a chance to talk with VIP’s of the trucking industry in the relaxed setting of a walk. Everyone will have the opportunity to talk with people who are not only leaders in the industry but may have designed some of the trucks that we drive. 

You can register for the walk before the show at truckingsolutionsgroup.org or during the show at the TA/Petro booth.  The Trucking Solutions Group web site has more details about the walk that will be held March 23rd at 9:00 in the morning before the show opens.  TA/Petro will be sponsoring the T-Shirts; FedEx Custom Critical is sponsoring coffee, tea, and fruit.  There will be goody bags given until the supply runs out. 

Some of the trucking VIPS who have registered for the walk are:

Bjorn Cannon – Real Wheels, Joe Rajkovacz – OOIDA, Miguel Soetaert, Detroit Diesel – Jeanie Silk, Great Lakes Convoy – Lance Wood, Trucker Charity – John K Elliott II -Load One Transport, Todd Spencer, OOIDA – Allen Smith, Ask the Trucker, Norita Taylor, OOIDA Sherri Lawrence Fronko, Women in Trucking Driver Advisory Council Member – Susan Wirth-White, Women in Trucking Driver Advisory Council Member – Kerry Mullins, Trucker Charity – Pam Pollock, Movin Out Magazine, Frank Sonzala, Pressure Systems International (PSI) – Jeff Maurer, Idle-Air – Bill Gansmen, All State Express Expedited Services

Members of the Trucking Solutions Group who will be in attendance will be: Rick Ash, Chairman Trucking Solutions Group – Linda Caffee, Chairman of the Driver Health Council – Bob Caffee, Henry Albert, Timothy Weber, Jeff Clark, Scott Grenerth and hopefully our newest member Brian Woodle.

There is a great deal of camaraderie to be had as we all walk towards a common goal of driver health awareness. 

I hope to see you at the walk,

Henry

60 or 65 M.P.H… The DDEC Reports

Hello everyone,

It’s sure nice to be back home after driving in the high winds all last week. I will not be driving next week as I’ll be catching up on some home projects and you’ll want to stay tuned to be informed on my new trailer modification which should enhance the aerodynamic package. 

My last DDEC Report was a bit lower than the previous week due to a week full of “high winds”. In addition to the wind, my loads were heavier as I mentioned in the previous blog. Below, I’ve included my DDEC Reports from day one to current. I only posted the corner so it would be easy to view the information. If there is a particular report in which you are interested, please let me know and I’ll be glad to post it for you. Reports # 13 and #14 are the only two which reflect the 60 M.P.H. limit (cruise speed).

* Note: take a close look at my average vehicle speed on all the reports and see how little the change was after slowing down five M.P.H. Something seems wrong with this picture… what do you think?

Till next time… be safe,

Henry

To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life

1

 

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

 

14

What Is The Answer To A Profitable Operation … 60 or 65 M.P.H.

Hello,
 
Since my last post, I’ve had time to reflect on choosing the most efficient speed for my operation. My conclusion is that it’s difficult to select an arbitrary number and say that is the fixed number due to many factors. 
 
1.  Delivery Schedule ( if it means missing a delivery schedule by just 15 minutes, this could upset your customer or quite possibly a missed load opportunity. For argument sake: let’s just say, on a Friday that missing a delivery window by just 15 minutes will have you and your truck tied up for the entire weekend without making any money. Also, take into consideration, what time you will arrive, pending your speed in regards to traffic in a major metropolitan area. If running faster will enable you to get an additional shipment then this may well make your extra fuel usage worth while).
 
2.  Weather Conditions ( If you’re running into a head wind, the additional wind speed will dramatically reduce your fuel mileage. By the same token, if you have a tail wind, your fuel usage will be impacted minimally and in some cases may even increase).
 
3. Home and Personal Time ( on my previous blog, I showed you the four weeks prior to testing at 60 M.P.H. What I found was a savings of approx. $160.00 on the worst week to a low of $12.00 on my best week. When I looked at my log books, my weekly driving time increased approx. 4.5 hours. With $160.00 savings per week, this would put my savings in at $35.55 per hour,  for the additional time spent. On the lowest savings week of $12.00, this would make my savings per hour $2.66. Obviously, the low end isn’t worth it. The higher number, depending what you have going on would be a personal decision. If you have a family event or activity then you may want to consider your options. Depending on what you do on the road, you may want to utilize your extra time to take a walk, read a book or visit a museum. This extra added time can have some value to you).
 
 
4. Vehicle Specifications  ( the largest factor in this area would be to make sure your truck is geared at the speed in which you intend to operate. What I’ve found, if your truck is geared to run at the 65 M.P.H. range, it can also do quite well at a lower speed of 60 M.P.H. under certain conditions. Some factors for running at the lower speed would include level terrain, light loads and head winds. It’s been my findings in the past, if you have a truck geared to run at the slower speed and try to run faster, the fuel usage penalty will be severe).
 
In my opinion, there are too many variables involved to just pick one speed that is most efficient for all conditions. There is so much to take into consideration when deciding what speed you will need to operate to be the most profitable on any given day.
 
I’m still continuing to test the results of running at 60 M.P.H. This week my gross vehicle weights were higher than normal with 58,000 lbs.on the southbound leg of my trip to Laredo, TX. On my trip back to Charlotte, NC the weight for my load was 76,000 lbs. My mileage is coming in a bit lower than normal due to not only higher G.V.W. but 20 to 30 mile per hour cross winds which I’ve been experiencing on this trip. As of Thursday morning, my in dash fuel usage read out indicates 8.98 M.P.G. This is not my highest number by any means, however with the conditions encountered in this weeks trip, I’m  more than pleased with these results. On Friday, I’ll be stopping in at Charlotte Freightliner to obtain a DDEC Report for your review. I’ll post it later in the week. Till next time… be safe,
 
Henry
To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life

The Results From The First Fillup at 60 M.P.H.

Hello,
 
This morning, I’ve just completed my first round-trip from Charlotte, NC to Laredo, TX at 60 M.P.H. When I reached Hattiesburg, MS I had put on 2,916 miles and my fuel tanks took 324.39 gallons to fill up. My fuel mileage calculated to be 8.89 M.P.G. I felt as though my mileage would have been closer to 9.3, however on the last day of the trip, I was in “very” windy conditions. All of my fuel mileage during the trip averaged out to be the normal .25 below what my engine report indicated.
 
Here are the four previous weekly results prior to performing this test. All of these numbers are at the 65 M.P.H. maximum cruise speed.
 
1st week: 2,908 miles – 360.02 gallons used – 8.07 fuel mileage
2nd week: 2,909 miles – 352.09 gallons used – 8.26 fuel mileage
3rd week: 2,876 miles – 345.16 gallons used – 8.33 fuel mileage
4th week – 2,891 miles – 327.47 gallons used – 8.82 fuel mileage
 
Regarding the mileage above… keep in mind that the temperatures have been warming each week. When the weather warms, the air is less dense, therefore making it easier for the truck to cut through the air. You can see these results in comparison from the 1st weeks fuel mileage number at 8.07 M.P.G to the 4th week at 8.82 M.P.G. My loaded weight during the five week period was relatively close to the same each week. The results of this test so far show me how important it is to have your truck specked  for the speed in which you want or need to operate. I have my truck specked for 63 – 65 M.P.H. and my record for a fill up is 9.37 M.P.G on this route and particular speed.
 
I plan on continuing the test at least through this Friday due to the amount of interest generated onmy blog. On Friday, when I return back to Charlotte, NC, my plans are to get another DDEC Report for you to review. Unfortunately, for the test, I’ll be off next week to take care of some things around the house and make another aerodynamic modification to the trailer. I already know that when I return from next week, I’ll be on a different route for two weeks. Therefore, we will need to resume this test in a couple of weeks. Stay tuned for the end of week results and I thank you for all the interest each of you have shown regarding this test for fuel efficiency. Till next time… be safe,
 
Henry
To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life

Day Five OF 60 M.P.H…DDEC REPORT

Hello,

Yesterday, I finished my travels in Tallapoosa, GA.  At the end of the day, the dash board fuel mileage read out indicated 9.68 M.P.G.

When I awoke in the morning, I headed for Atlanta, GA and managed to drive through without any problems as I beat rush hour… I was a happy camper. Charlotte, NC was just several hours away and I made my delivery and pick up for next week. Then, it was on to Freightliner of Charlotte, NC. The week before, I had run a DDEC Report prior to beginning this test and I wanted to run another one exactly to the mile as I ended this week of the test. My DDEC Report like my dash board display, reads .25 better than my figures calculated from the fuel pump. The DDEC Report remains consistent unlike your figures calculated from the fuel pump.

Take a look below at the before and after DDEC Reports to view the results for yourself. You can double click on the reports to make them larger for easy viewing.

65 Mile per hour max cruise speed report…

Below is the report for 2,903.2 miles at 60 M.P.H. max cruise speed

Here are some things to note: 1. Driving slower decreased the engine load factor by 3%. 2. My actual mile per hour  average speed changed very little. I think the average speed staying nearly the same after reducing my speed by 5 mile per hour maybe a fluke due to exceptionally good traffic conditions on this trip. I will be looking at this figure again next week as I continue this test.

Looks like I’ll be traveling at 60 M.P.H a bit longer based on this report.

 

Till next time be safe,

Henry

To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life

Day Four Of 60 M.P.H. Test

Hello everyone,

I began the morning in Roanoke, LA and traveled across I-10 east to I-12 east to I-35 north. I stopped to fuel at my normal location in Hattiesburg, MS. Unfortunately, the truck stop had a long back up as they were having problems with their fuel pumps. I decided to leave this location and fuel at another time later in the day. As I turned back onto I-35 north, my mind relected on the fact that my last D.P.F. regen had occurred shortly after the previous fueling. This meant the truck had traveled over 1,550 miles since its last regen. Therefore, this meant that I could possibly have two regens before my next fuel up instead of just one regen. Soon after getting up to speed… my next driving regen started. The result will be a fuel mileage number which does not directly compare to my normal southern half fuel mileage.  My fuel mileage will fare better than average on the  northern half of my route. Reason being… there will be no driving regens on the northern half of the route.*(Note: My Detroit Diesel DD15 has never required a parked D.P.F. Regeneration. I did have one done by a mechanic just to demonstrate how a parked regen is performed properly).

I continued on  I-20 east toward Tuscaloosa, AL for my next fuel up. I glanced at the in dash average fuel mileage reading to find it was sitting at 9.52 M.P.G. This was a bit lower than I thought it would be, however with two regens, it’s a good number. After fueling, I took my figures, entered them into my calculator and the fuel mileage came out to 9.04 M.P.G. My calculator and dash board readings were much farther apart than normal due to my truck sitting on “level ground” compared to where I normally fuel, allowing me to get more fuel into the tanks. (On average, my dash board display reads .25 better than my calculated figures from the pump).

Tomorrow, after arriving in Charlotte, NC,  I will post my DDec Report from this trip, as well as the previous 15,810 miles. I am now 1,760 miles into this exercise. Till next time… be safe,

Henry

To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life

Day Three Of 60 M.P.H. Test

Hello,
 
Here are the results from day three of running at 60 M.P.H maximum cruise speed. 
 
Upon making my delivery and pick up in Laredo, TX my dash board fuel display indicated 9.38 M.P.G. I proceeded onto I-35 to San Antonio, TX where I had a steady head wind and my fuel mileage still continued to climb to 9.42. Next, I went across I-10 to Roanoke, Louisiana and took my ten hour rest period. In Roanoke, my dashboard fuel mileage read out indicated 9.55 M.P.G. At this point, I’ve traveled 1,311 miles since my last fill up.
 
Going forward, I’m anxious to see how all this plays out by the beginning of next week as I’ll have a full round trip in the record books. Thanks for all of your interest and comments regarding fuel efficiency. Stay tuned and we’ll see what happens…
 
Henry
To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life

Day Two of 60 M.P.H. Test

Unloaded and nowhere to go in Laredo, TX

Hello everyone,
 
Day two of testing the Cascadia at 60 M.P.H. didn’t go as well as day one. Here is what happened on day two.
 
1. When I pulled out of Seguin, TX, the dash fuel mileage display started at 9.98 M.P.G. 
 
2. I encountered windy conditions and some rain while heading on I-10 to San Antonio, TX
 
3. A short traffic jam in San Antonio, TX
 
4. After getting onto I-35 south to finish my trip to Laredo TX,  I experienced a steady head wind all the way to my destination.
 
5. The end result was a dash fuel mileage readout of 9.6 M.P.G.
 
 6. If all of this wasn’t enough… after delivering my shipment, I found out the load for the return trip to Charlotte, NC would not be ready till the next morning.  
 
The distance traveled for the day was only 197 miles and the distance from the start of this exercise has been 796 miles. I’m anxious to see where the fuel mileage figures go as I finish my trip. Stay tuned to see what happens next,
 
Henry 
To follow how my friends the Caffee’s are doing with their five M.P.H. increase in speed go to… Its A Teams Life